John Mark Hicks’ discussions on baptism and children (Part 1 and Part 2) have made me think about the different imagery used in the NT for baptism. I was taught to believe that baptism was for the purpose of washing away sins (and quietly we would add that we also receive the gift of the Holy Spirit). I was also taught that if you did not come to baptism with this understanding then your baptism was invalid.
I still believe that baptism washes away sins, but is that the only way to approach baptism? Have we put baptism in this little box, and then claimed that we have the final word on baptism? Have we taken something mysterious and multi-faceted, and domesticated it to a single facet?
As I read through the scriptures I get a much larger view of baptism and its many different facets. Jesus’ baptism had nothing to do with forgiveness (for he was sinless). It was a moment of obedience and identity. Cornelius and his family were known as devout, God-fearing people. Their baptism seemed to be more for the purpose of belonging and acceptance, not for sin washing. In Acts we find some people already being labeled “disciples” and they were baptized solely for the purpose of receiving the Holy Spirit. In Peter’s first letter he indicates that baptism is about our consciences because baptism is “the pledge of a clear conscience toward God” (1 Peter 3:21).
Please note that I am thinking outloud more than anything. I have not come to any strong conclusions on this issue. I have a high view of baptism, so this is not about the neccessity/importance of baptism. This is about the purpose(s) of baptism. What are your thoughts?
I would agree with all of your thoughts. My journey to baptism (17 Feb 2008) was on a different path to most others and I was very aware that my baptism for for many reasons. I did get told by some “ardent” lady that if I didn’t believe that I was being baptised expressly to be saved that my baptism was pointless. Praise God I was secure in my understanding then that baptism was not that one dimensional.